Archive for the 'Cinema' Category

Nov 15 2008

Bond. James Bond.

Or, should it be, Bond. Daniel Craig. I would argue the latter!

BOX: 007 ON TRACK FOR $70M OPEN…

CHART…

Quantum of Solace

Daniel Craig rocks! This new iteration, the Daniel Craig iteration, of Bond just blows everything else away!The old James Bond was great for what it was—a Comic book quality of spy and espionage and the New James Bond is like real spy stuff. People get killed. Bond takes a beating, gives a beating, and himself gets bruised and bloodied! So do the new Bond women.

Now, I find Craig a devilishly sexy man with a killer body. But, interestingly enough if Craig was a woman I would say he was a Butta-face. I can’t explain why exactly he’s so damned good looking—he just is! Maybe it’s his eyes, maybe it’s just that he’s so tough and brutal…

Story-line itself is a little convoluted, but it works for me because Daniel Craig is such a bad ass!

Bond babes are H O T—Hot and they both (there are two of them in Quantum Solace) work—chemistry is there with Craig, but also with the audience.

This movie takes place where Casino Royale left off—literally in Italy. There are some reoccurring characters, some we’ll see again, but some we won’t.

There are some good chases including an outstanding boat chase. I also liked the inside peak into the new headquarters of British Intelligence and computing of the future.

You know that the capability of technology in the movie seems possible today, but you know that it currently doesn’t happen that way yet—not even at the highest level.

I don’t think they completely followed the path they set up, but maybe it will be tied to future story lines.

I think that the reason it might not have gotten glowing critical reviews is because the bad guy is using Green earth and global warming as a cloak. As in, there is evil every where, even behind good causes.

I can’t wait for the next one!

Other Voices:
Ultimate James Bond Fan Blog Review: Quantum of Solace by Deborah Lipp

James Bond (Daniel Craig), having shot Mr. White (Jesper Christensen) at the end of Casino Royale, interrogates him and learns of a secret organization known as Quantum. Following sparse leads, Bond finds Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric) and pursues him to the Bolivian desert. Directed by Marc Forster.

The Wardman Wire Quantum of Solace: Review By David Keen

The Huffingtonpost.com “Quantum of Solace” Green Review (with Spoilers) by Dave Burdick

Technorati Tags: ,

7 responses so far

Oct 20 2008

W

Dubbya!

Fandango’s fan ratings said So-So. Fandango almost talked us right out of it—doesn’t take much!

Now, as far as I’m concerned it’s a must see, I need first hand intel so that I can talk about it intelligently. I’m expecting a Big Bush Bash from all the flap that’s been bantered about.

Oliver Stone has talked about GWB in a in a less than positive light with much disdain. Of course lauded by all the Hollywood Jester Intellectuals

Much publicity and fanfare has been led up to the opening and much to my surprise this So-So fan rating that I just couldn’t figure out.

You know good-ole Ollie is going to make GW look like a buffoon every chance he gets. Drinking, drunking, talking while chewing food with his mouth open, quiting job after job that his father set up, always looking for his fathers approval—never getting it because it was going to Jeb…

Meanwhile, George gets his act together, gets off the sauce, finds God, and GETS his father elected President by running his campaign. Eventually, becoming Governor of Texas on his way over to beating Al Gore’s pathetic ass to be President of the USA.

The movie humanized George Bush quite a bit after he has been demonized by almost everybody in the world for years now. W although a Oliver Stone movie, story, and imagination in a long line of these types of movies by Stone, it’s not a bash for bash sake.

Oliver spreads the blame for the administrations mistakes along the hard road the US has recently been on. Rumsfeld and Cheney take the biggest hits for what Stone leads us to believe are the conductors orchestrating their version of the dangerous world through Bush.

Bush is tortured by his own failures, his brothers shadow, his father’s legacy of victories and shortcomings, and ultimately, Bush is tortured by believing he’s doing the right thing all along for the right reasons—all in the best interest of the USA and the majority of America and the world doesn’t see it.

Josh Brolin does an excellent job—there are times he is a dead wringer for George W. Bush—Bushy!

Three quarters of the way in it hit me why this movie was only rated So-So—it wasn’t the red-meat Bush Bashers wanted! They only got to wet their beak, Stone made him look like an unsophisticated redneck-country boy with daddy problems, following his heart about what’s right, and mislead by those around him.

I’m gonna tell you that I liked it! I thought it was well done.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

One response so far

Oct 19 2008

SNL on Saturday Night!

Published by iChef Cinema under All, Cinema, Entertainment, News, Op / Ed

I will say, when I heard Sarah Palin was going to be on SNL, I said, oh no! WHY?

There’s no winning here, what is the possible gain? I was imagining another John McCain on The View ambush job! You know the one: Barbra Walters (once serious journalist…) doesn’t look at McCain while interrogating him with disdain like a murderer, or Joy Bahr calling him a liar to his face, or Whoppie asking him if he plans on bringing back slavery..

TheView / McCain interview was painful to watch. It put some people in a very bad light as far as I was concerned. Uncomfortable for all, unforgivable for me!

After seeing SNL live I can say it was well done. Sarah Palin looked good, the SNL players seemed respectful, and it looked like it was all in good fun. It’s amazing how much Tina Fey and Palin actually look a like. SNL was NO The View interview—thankfully!

Palin was confident, funny, and pulled it off. The writing was well done—I laughed quite a bit! So, I was wrong, Palin looked like the better person for it (and I guess was the answer to my WHY—definitely, “a good sport!”

By the way the rest of SNL wasn’t that funny, unfortunate because I think it had potential with Josh Brolin.

By Michelle Malkin: Saturday Night Live: open thread; Sarah Palin’s a good sport

By TheAnchoress: Sarah Palin SNL Reactions

My impression: she’s a natural on camera; completely comfortable - no surprise. And clearly a good sport.

The SNL cast, on the other hand, seemed a bit uncomfortable and stiff. Alec Baldwin’s a good sport, too.

By Allahpundit: Video: Palin on SNL

—iChef Cinema

Technorati Tags: , , ,

6 responses so far

Oct 13 2008

The Tolerant Intolerance

tolerant intolerance | ‘täl erent| |in ‘täl erens|

State of being
1 showing willingness to be tolerant, but hypocritically exhibiting extreme unwillingness to tolerate something, in particular the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with :not tolerant of others’ views, beliefs, or behavior that differ from one’s own : he was intolerant of her philosophical difference of political views by screaming obscenities to stifle her voice from being heard.

tolerant | ‘täl erent|
adjective
1 showing willingness to allow the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with : we must be tolerant of others | a more tolerant attitude toward other religions.

tolerance |’täl erens|
noun
1 the ability or willingness to tolerate something, in particular the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with : the tolerance of corruption | an advocate of religious tolerance.

intolerant |in ‘täl erent|
adjective
not tolerant of others’ views, beliefs, or behavior that differ from one’s own : he was intolerant of ignorance.
• unable to be given (a medicine or other treatment) or to eat (a food) without adverse effects : intolerant of aspirin | [ postpositive ] these patients were lactose intolerant.

From The Anchoress: The Middle Finger… says it all!

It is so obvious, so pathetic, why can’t they see it? The ground work has been put in place for this transformation for the last 40 years or so. Each step of the way taking a little more in the name of tolerance, each step of the way being less tolerant of other view points… Can it be more ironic? Or is it that it isn’t ironic at all, but part of the plan and always has been—may be it’s not part of the plan, but in fact IS the plan.

It’s working. You see it now more than ever. And the wish to play itself out and see it cave in on itself will never happen because those leading the charge will never admit it. Those following will never admit it because that would mean admitting that they were wrong (by not being tolerant of other view points) and personal responsibility is not part of the plan. (which is also part of the plan—take away personal responsibility so that it’s always someone else’s fault…Blame others!) The true believers don’t have the ability to see it—that functionality has been scraped away from their DNA little bits at a time. All in the name of the greater good. Ah, the greater good…

This is exactly what I’m talking about!

Ed Morrissey: Barone: The thugocracy cometh

Michael Barone warns that a victory by Barack Obama will endorse his tactics in silencing critics, which should concern all non-leg-tingling media in this country. In fact, Barone points out that it will merely be the next step to the Left’s “progressive” march into killing free political speech — or at least that speech with which they disagree:

Amused Cynic: “…the coming liberal Thugocracy….”

Further update: Yard sign rage. Just lovely. The same kind of losers who keyed my car. If this had happened to an Obama sign Katie Couric would be reporting it.

Got TOLERANCE? From the people of tolerance: This is just too good—must see to believe—all in one place—ala Michelle Malkin: Crush the Obamedia narrative: Look who’s “gripped by insane rage”

Update10/27/08: The tolerance of the Left

by Ed Morrissey

Disgusting!

Disgusting!

The latent misogyny and bigotry of the Left?

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

5 responses so far

Oct 04 2008

Eagle Eye

Shia LaBeouf is very intense in this action thriller. He was so much better in Eagle Eye than he was in that Indiana Jones ripoff! He’s a very talented actor a who is coming into his own. There is good chemistry with his leading lady—Michelle Monaghan. She has a very familiar look, but I can’t place her.

The movie itself starts off on fire! Chasing, escaping, running, hiding! Action packed, car chasing, car wrecking, and a commanding voice controlling all the action! You don’t know who the voice is or who the voice works for and it totally works, it’s totally compelling! Although I now know who the actual voice was…

Billy Bob Thornton does a good job pulling off the FBI agent tough guy.

The technology is close enough for it to all be very believable.

As good as the movie started I thought it ended quite predictably. It’s been done so many times before. On top of it, the sour note came as they preached to us—Shut up! I’m not interested in your trite preachy political mantra!

The idea and plot of the last Bruce Willis Die Hard movie, Live Free or Die Hard, was much better than Eagle Eye. Eagle Eye was entertaining and exciting I will give you that, but…

—iChef Cinema

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

No responses yet

Oct 04 2008

Barney Frank… Classic! Tool!

Lotta ins, lotta outs, lotta what-have-you’s. It’s a very complicated case, Maude—Jeff Lebowski.

Frank Video: Fannie and Freddie is FINE:

Frank and O’Reilly cage match:

Commentary:

UPDATE 10/07/2008

This in from Ed Morrissey at HotAir: Frank: Criticism of Congress is now racist, too

Barney Frank’s latest defense of Congress over the financial meltdown could be predicted based on the success of Barack Obama’s campaign in using the same defense. According to Rep. Frank, any attempt to pin the blame for the collapse of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on the activities of both, as well as Congressional policy that fueled it, is now officially racist. Frank says conservatives want to blame minorities for the collapse. Let’s keep score.

Criticizing Obama means we’re racists. Criticizing Congress means we’re racists. Getting angry at Congress for pushing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into buying bad loans and infecting the entire financial system with essentially fraudulent paper — at a cost of up to $700 billion in taxpayer money and potentially trillions in lost investments — means we’re racists.

How about this from The Anchoress:

Unafraid of being called an “over the line racist” John McCain finally started fighting. And yes, now it’s racist to talk about Fannie Mae. All subjects that might harm Barack Obama’s chances in November: racist. The Dems are finally dulling the effect of that word with their overuse.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

No responses yet

Sep 23 2008

Biden Obama, Biden Obama, Biden Obama

Question: How can you say Sarah Palin doesn’t have experience, and at the same time say that Barack Obama does? Question: And when asked what example can you cite, the same people say BO has run a successful primary campaign…

Question: How can you say Sarah Palin is BAD, BAD, BAD, and when asked for an example, you say she was for the bridge to nowhere before she was against it and she used that example on national TV. (She was for it, as a matter of opinion, before she was in a position, she didn’t vote or anything for it, it was put to her as a question on her campaign for governor trail—and she said yes.) All this aside, Palin is bad and not worthy because she was for the idea of the bridge.

Question: So by that rationale anybody in the US Senate who voted for money that would go to this bridge is ALSO BAD—no? The key word is rationale… Ah, rationale!

Question: My guess is if Biden and Obama voted for the money it would be okay, because of the rationale of double standard. Even if they BOTH voted for keeping the bill alive twice AND voted once against an amendment that would strip out the money for the bridge project from the bill. They have immunity to these horrendous charges—they are still better than the BAD Sarah Palin! Right? Because she’s BAD! No, that would be hypocritical, and the people who are RIGHT (LEFT) are never hypocrites—right?

Question: So, the question remains, what do you do when your argument negates itself and in keeping your argument proves you are a hypocrite, what do you do? Some proof and video, from all places, CNN!

Question: What’s this? Investigative reporting from CNN??? MUST See video!

DEWEY BEACH, Delaware (CNN) — Although Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden routinely mocks his Republican counterpart, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, for her onetime support of the infamous “Bridge to Nowhere,” Biden and his running mate voted to keep the project alive twice.

Both Biden and Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama voted to kill a Senate amendment that would have diverted federal funding for the bridge to repair a Louisiana span badly damaged by Hurricane Katrina, Senate records show.

And both voted for the final transportation bill that included the $223 million earmark for the Alaska project.

An amendment offered by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Oklahoma, would have stripped the money appropriated to connect the Alaskan coastal city of Ketchikan to its airport on sparsely populated Gravina Island and diverted the money to Louisiana.

But Biden andObama and 80 of their colleagues rejected the measure, an amendment to a massive 2005 transportation bill that funded thousands of projects across the country.

Change is what you want… R i g h t

Question: Is the above news some kind of trick or trap? It seems so obvious… As formerly stated on TheAnchoressOnline: Astroturfing Palin & Race-baiting, etc UPDATED

This goes along with my previous point. What the press does not want you to see, you will not see. What it does want you to see, you’ll see everywhere. The press wants you to see Sarah Palin and John McCain in the worst possible way, and Obama in the best. Which would be fine, if they’d just admit it and stop pretending they’re the gatekeepers and mediating intelligences who are somehow “keeping things balanced.”

As Archie Bunker used to say, Good night nurse!”

—iChef Politikos

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

No responses yet

Sep 22 2008

Ace Wasabi: How Important is the Waiter

Published by iChef under All, Cinema, Restaurants, iChef

Let’s just say that San Fransisco is one of my favorite places and of all the restaurants in SF that I enjoy, Ace Wasabi is at the top of the list, an A lister, easily top 5 (only because I can’t single ONE out like that—that would just be wrong, wouldn’t be fair, why should one be forced to anyway?) When anyone comes in from out of town we go to Ace Wasabi!

There have been variety of servers over the years: to die for, beautiful fun, fun eclectic, groovy foodie, dreamy charming, and some mix match combination of the above.

Some have been outstanding, some just good, but only one waiter disaster (but nothing that Ace Wasabi’s fabulous food couldn’t make me forget)—I care not to recall that evening here—know he paid dearly for his gross incompetence.

But this past Friday we had a new experience—UGLY! Ugly that couldn’t be covered up by the fantastic food, beer, and hot sake. This is because the hot sake was so hot it scorched my tongue and I couldn’t really taste much after that.

We didn’t have to wait to be seated at 7:45PM which seemed odd, but a good thing at the time. But we were seated all-the-way-all-the-way in the back where it was hot and steamy—the window that we opened let smokers smoke sit at the table with us, which we agreed was better than the heat and humidity we were experiencing.

We did wait for at least 15 minutes before anyone came by to ask if we wanted dinner. Our humble waiter smelled like smoke and looked a little disheveled, like he just rolled out of bed or something else. We wanted drinks! *We were still in the benefit-of-the-doubt zone* We ordered drinks and Tuna Tataki— Ace has the best Tuna Tataki (recipe) I’ve had anywhere!

The drinks weren’t brought out to the table until the Tuna Tataki was brought out—usually the drinks come out first. It wasn’t that busy for a Friday night. I have been there on nights where there are wall-to-wall people and never waited for a drink! Packed—you can’t even move without your body-rubbing, brushing, and or bumping with hundreds of strangers. (Okay Phobic’s, it’s a happening place, cool good looking people—not always unwelcome…)

When the large Asahi beer, hot sake, edamame and Tataki were dropped off at the table the waiter didn’t bother to take the rest of our order… (Why would he?) No one checked back to see how we were doing—if they had they would have seen we were out of drinks and food—with no food on the way! I had to ask the Busboy to get our waiter. Patience dwindling!

We ordered more beer and hot sake and a series of rolls and sushi—very excited! Our excitement evaporating after 30 minutes went by—I got up to physically locate our waiter—I found him looking at this fancy new age Jukebox and he was surprised to see me. I asked where our drinks were, “Oh! Coming right up.” he said. Have you seen my patience they were here a minute ago—I’m sure!

While in the restroom, he brought beer with some excuse why the sake wasn’t also delivered. Still it was a half an hour without a word or even visiting the table. The people I was with asked about our food order and like a deer in the headlights—it appeared that he forgot about our food. GREAT!

The sake arrived just barely warm—I sent it back! I didn’t wait almost 45 minutes for hot sake to be just barely warm! Well, the waiter showed me! I shot the boiling sake down and torched my mouth—you’ve been there, shreds of the roof of your mouth hanging down on your newly singed tongue…

Again no one checked to see how we were doing, I couldn’t taste a thing anyway! We needed more drinks, we needed more wasabi, we needed attention! We eventually needed the check and again NO ONE!

I have high expectations and hate to be disappointed, but Ace, which I have been to a million times, is always spot on—disappointment is never a thought…

Well, as diners we have rights, at the very least we have options and the strongest option we have to send a message to the waiter is the TIP. What is my imperfect night worth? Dinner wasn’t cheap. My standard tip is 20%—I was generous, he got 10%! He deserved ZERO, so I’m little upset with myself. A manager wasn’t visible if there was one there at all—I should have asked…

He picked up the check while we were still sitting at the table (something else I don’t care for) The people I was with knew he would know his reward shortly and the collective wisdom was that we should leave, but I wanted him to know… We didn’t get up until the yelling started. He got the message!

How important is the waiter, if you’re the owner of a restaurant and you just read this, you tell me!

I could have put this section at the top, but chose to add it at the bottom.

I need to disclose: This review is about my last experience at Ace Wasabi Rock and Roll Sushi, this past weekend. And I won’t be holding this last visit against them because I’ve been there a million times and this one horrible visit shouldn’t ruin it. However I will be watching very closely until I can remove this past experience from my mind.

The failure on this night rests squarely on the waiter, however a manager should have picked up on it if they were there!

—iChef

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

4 responses so far

Sep 22 2008

Burn After Reading

or before...

or before...

Maybe I don’t need to wait…

You have the Coen Brothers—Ethan & Joel with an ensemble cast of Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Frances McDormand, John Malkovich, and Richard Jenkins.

Based on the trailer this was going to be a smash hit with a magnitude size of The Big Lebowski! Memorable characters, fantastic dialog, and great great story! That’s what it looked like. I would even say there were moments throughout the movie that I thought were lines or parts of lines, or the timing or melody of lines that were straight out of the Big Lebowski. Now, I have seen the Big Lebowski in excess of 100 times, I know this movie, this is a movie I know (Sexy Beast—I’ve also seen a few times) Almost to a fault I was reminded, the more I watched the more I was reminded that Burn After Reading was no Big Lebowski... Thanks to BunnieLebowski, another similarity could be viewed here!

The bummer was that the trailer showed all the best parts. So, “fuck-it,” I’m gonna save you the cost and a trip to the movies. The trailer! (Fuck-it, that’s your answer to everything isn’t it? My condolences, the bums lost! My advice to you, is to do what your parents did—get a job sir! —Classic lines from TBL)

There was a ton of potential: writing, directing, and acting! The teaser bits from the trailer went no where! The story never really took off or jelled. The quirkiness of the characters could have went in more interesting places. If I had to pick one positive aspect, I would pick the acting.

Not the end for the Brothers Coen, after all, they have a laundry list of smash classics, the aforementioned The Big Lebowski , Fargo , No Country for Old Men , O Brother, Where Art Thou?, Raising Arizona, just to name a few!

Sometimes the the best part is the wait and that’s the way I saw it this time! (yes, to be fair this was based on only one viewing and sometimes the Coen movies need more than one for the full impact!) Let’s face it, most people only give something one shot!

—iChef Cinema

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 responses so far

Sep 17 2008

We Need the Eggs…

Published by iChef Cinema under All, Cinema, Entertainment

One of our writers will be attending her High School reunion this fall, which reminded me of a friend from HS who always quoted these great Woody Allen lines. I don’t know why I thought of it tonight, but this line from Annie Hall always cracked me up!

Alvy Singer: [narrating] After that it got pretty late, and we both had to go, but it was great seeing Annie again. I… I realized what a terrific person she was, and… and how much fun it was just knowing her; and I… I,

“I thought of that old joke, y’know, the, this… this guy goes to a psychiatrist and says, “Doc, uh, my brother’s crazy; he thinks he’s a chicken.” And, uh, the doctor says, “Well, why don’t you turn him in?” The guy says, “I would, but I need the eggs.”

Well, I guess that’s pretty much now how I feel about relationships; y’know, they’re totally irrational, and crazy, and absurd, and… but, uh, I guess we keep goin’ through it because, uh, most of us… need the eggs.

I love old Woody Allen—there was real comic genius…

—iChef Cinema

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

No responses yet

Next »