Archive for the 'Movies' Category

Jun 15 2009

Always an Excuse

What happens here?

Durbin cashed out during big stock collapse

WASHINGTON | Asset sales came after meeting with Fed, Treasury chiefs

As U.S. stock markets plummeted last September, the Senate’s No. 2 Democrat, Dick Durbin, sold more than $115,000 worth of stocks and mutual-fund shares and used much of the money to invest in Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

“Durbin was doing what a lot of other people were doing, taking a look at their savings” and seeing it “start to tank and trying to preserve some level of wealth by getting out of the market,” said his spokesman, Joe Shoemaker.

And the excuse:

Shoemaker said Durbin didn’t capitalize on anything Paulson and Bernanke told congressional leaders at the Sept. 18 meeting.

Whatever information Paulson gave lawmakers wasn’t secret or classified and was disclosed publicly the next day, Shoemaker said.

The Commentary:

And they get away with it everythime! I heard someone say the other day that when you get elected to Congress you should have to put all investments in a blind trust for the durtion of you stay in Congress—to avoid the temptations of greed that seem to be part of the reason people run for office. Don’t let that bit about wanting what’s best for the country crap get in your head.

I don’t care if you’re a Democrat or Republican or Purple—yes, they all do it and WE COULD stand up and prevent it if we all stood up as ONE! The technology of the day makes it easier than ever before!

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

No responses yet

Jun 13 2009

The Final Frontier

Space.

These are the voyages of the Star Ship Enterprise.

star_trek_03_1024

Full Disclosure:

I’m a fan of Star Trek, the original series from the late 60’s. I used to watch the reruns on channel 11 WPIX when I got home from long nights of work and the inability to go to sleep from the dinner rush when I got home. I can do the Vulcan peace sign and raise either eyebrow to signal a myriad of different emotions, questions, or expressions. I own the original series on VHS tape that I recorded with and without commercials. I believe the creator of the series, Gene Roddenberry, is a genius for his vision, his predictions of the future, and dealing with ground breaking (at the time to deal with) subject matter: interracial relations, political opinion, space travel and meddling in other cultures and civilizations, etc.

I’m an original Trekkie, not a costumed fanatic, but a fan who knows and cares a lot about the original series. I couldn’t wait for the Next Generation to come out when it was on the horizon and as I affectionately refer to it as The Degeneration, you know how I feel. I couldn’t have been more disappointed by an old man (french no less) Captain Jean Luc Picard, replacing the coolest, baddest, green girl getting—Captain James T. Kirk (William Shatner.

Lets talk about JJ Abrams and his Star Trek. Lets just say JJ has issues with time and space. Okay I already hate his use of time and space in LOST (and when I say “hate,” I mean I hate it so much I can’t wait for each and every episode to come on so I can try to figure SOMETHING out!) Dude—you have issues with the past, present, and the future!

Things I liked: the characters—they did the original cast proud! James T. Kirk scruffy scrapper with balls of titanium, Spock nicely done and he gets a smoken hot Lieutenant Uhura, Scotty by Simon Peg a surprise to me and I liked it, surprise of surprises was Bones—excellent job with dialog, mannerisms, and swagger. I also liked the more-than-just-a-cameo by Leonard Nimoy. Honorable mention goes to Chekov!

Things I didn’t care for: The story line. What’s with fucking with the original story? This was supposed to be the backstory, not the revised story! Not to mention a very much a convoluted revised story. Overall, I enjoyed the movie for it’s concept, characters, and future potential.

Things I look forward to: the future of the new (old) Star Trek movies series with the (new) original crew. I liked the characters so much and potential future of story lines.

I enjoyed the movie and recommend it!

No responses yet

May 05 2009

X-Men Origins: Wolverine

wolverine

Wolverine…

I have to say after the first X-Men movie I wasn’t really thrilled. I had no prior knowledge of the comic book series or the storyline which is okay. My belief is that a movie needs to be able to stand on it’s own regardless of the series number or sequel. INDEPENDENT. That being said I watched the second and third and I think my favorite is either number 2 or 3—I liked the blue hairy guy Dr. Henry ‘Hank’ McCoy / Beast played by Kelsey Grammer. The X-Men franchise has been growing on me steadily with each sequel.

Not knowing the back story, personally, I needed more information to give the movie more umph! Or just start the series in a logical order—which, in a sense, breaks my belief of the need to stand on it’s own.

Well, this latest iteration—the BACKSTORY on Logan / Wolverine let’s us in on all that background I’ve been jonsing and I really enjoyed it! Hugh Jackman is Wolverine/Logan and again rocks the part!

I liked the storyline, I liked the characters, I liked the violence, and I liked the girlKayla Silverfox

I’m wondering if they could make any of the other characters origin story as interesting (I know they’ll try!)—after all they did introduce a bunch of the other characters from the previous X-Men movies which made this movie fun and interesting.

Hugh Jackman is hot, Lynn Collins is hot in the movie (having trouble finding her hot off screen though), the story is hot, how can you go wrong…

******

Other Voices:

‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’ Press Conference – The Cast and Director Gavin Hood

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

No responses yet

Mar 06 2009

Who Watched the Watchmen

Published by iChef Cinema under All, Cinema, Movies, iChef Cinema

UPDATED March 8, 2009:

After a couple of days of thought about the movie Watchmen I have a couple of additions that I didn’t have when I wrote the original review. Two issues: costume /makeup and casting.

Malin Akerman: whom had the perfect look—hot! Her rendition of Silk Spectre II kicked ass, (don’t forget that!) except for a couple of scenes (which were not really in her control.) When they took her bangs away and parted her hair over her forehead—It happened only briefly, but it did interrupt the fantasy…

They used the wrong colors on her crime fighting uniform for her shoulder area or they should have given the uniform shoulder pads to build out her frame. As it was she looked small, petite, like she didn’t have a neckline—again the scenes were brief, but I’m updating my thoughts and that’s what I think.

Those were the cosmetic thoughts and now there is an issue with casting—Patrick Wilson as Nite Owl II. I really wanted to believe and like this actor in this role I immediately thought about him being in  Hard Candy. Part of the reason I wanted him to well was because his performance was chilling as a predator/pedophile/killer! But I can’t get that character out of my head. So I ask why was he chosen to be a superhero? His acting skills are right on but… Maybe he looked good in the Nite Owl suit… He did have the cleft chin that looked cool with his mask.

Also, the villain Ozymandias played by Matthew Goode was just eh… Didn’t really have the look which would have been ok if he brought the attitude, but he didn’t. So, I’m not sure why he was selected… This could be because I don’t know the graphic novel version of Watchmen and it might be explained there.

Original post starts here:

Wowie Kazoo! Watchmen rocks!

I had no expectations, didn’t really know the story going in. I did know that it was based on comic books so I loosely knew it would be an action superhero type thing.

Lots of buzz on the street. I liked it! I liked it very much!

It was a long movie and I didn’t mind a bit. It wasn’t trite in the sense that it wasn’t a made for kids sensibilities—It was a comic book for adults! Ultra violence, strong language, sex—it had it all! —Including what I consider a solid plot, some really good acting especially Rorschach played by Kelly Leak from The Bad News Bears in Breaking Training days—Jackie Earle Haley, great costumes and special effects. I really liked the small details like the characters names for instance. The music also kicked a lot of ass!

I don’t know where you go from here with sequels because this was really good and my favorite character dies in the end… No spoiler because you don’t know which character was my favorite.

Billy Crudup: was solid as Dr. Manhattan. Malin Akerman: kicked ass as Silk Spectre II. Patrick Wilson as Nite Owl II did a good job making me forget his chilling character Jeff Kohlver from Hard Candy. Jeffrey Dean Morgan: as The Comedian was really a good character! Zack Snyder did and awesome job of directing—this was better that 300 !

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No responses yet

Feb 18 2009

The Wrestler

Published by admin under All, Cinema, Entertainment, Movies, iChef Cinema

A film review by iChef Swett.

The first thing I’ll tell moviegoers is that The Wrestler is not a feel-good movie. Though there are moments of humor and joy interspersed between the gritty plot and its rich cast of characters.

If you are like me and have grown nauseatingly tried of the same old formulaic bubble gum romantic comedies (boy meets girl – boy does something dumb and loses girl – boy does something good and wins girl back), and you long for something with more spirit and meaning, something a bit more raw but still with a whole lot of heart, then look no further.

Speaking of formulas – prior to seeing this film one might suspect a typical washed up underdog plot whose title character takes a couple wrong turns before turning it all around in a cinema noir dramedy. But one would be very wrong. The recipe is more like Raging Bull meets Sunday Night Smackdown, with a little bit of the Passion of the Christ mixed in.

As the name implies, it is not really a film about wrestling so much as it is a film about a wrestler. An aging wrestler realizing retirement whose made a lifetime of mistakes and is now just trying to get by and perhaps atone for some of his sins.

From the moment the film opens with the heart pounding drums of Bang Your Head by Quiet Riot, we are drawn into the turbulent world of Randy ‘The Ram’ Robinson (Mickey Rourke).
Ram, a pro wrestling star of the 1980’s who at the height of his popularity had his own character in a Nintendo wrestling game, is now a washed up has-been living in poverty somewhere in Pennsylvania.

Filmmaker Darren Aronofsky is brilliant in the first few scenes, not letting you see any close-up shots of Ram’s face for a good 5 minutes into the picture. He keeps the camera deliberately on but “off” his main character; shooting Ram instead from behind, from the ground, and on dark lit sets. By making you wait and only teasing with glimpses of the man and myth, he manages to build up intrigue and interest, forcing you to become more emotionally invested in his protagonist’s journey early on.

Randy (Mickey) scrapes by on a meager living from selling autographs at the local American Legion Hall for $8.00 each, taking odd jobs like slicing meat at the deli counter, and performing in small scale wrestling gigs set in dimly lit halls before a few hundred blood thirsty snarling men.

Sidelined permanently by health problems and barely able to pay his own rent, Randy attempts to make a go of normal life. He finds temporary satisfaction in lap dances from his lone confidant stripper (Marisa Tomei) and a second chance at a possible relationship with the daughter (Evan Rachel Wood) he abandoned years ago. While trying to keep it on the straight and narrow, always in the background lurks the temptation of fame, excess, and possible death should he return to his true calling.

During a lap dance, Cassidy (Marisa) tells Ram that he looks like Jesus after seeing the tattoo of Jesus on his back. Cassidy quotes the Passion of the Christ from the scene where Jesus was suffering merciless beatings at the hands of the Roman soldiers. “He was one tough dude,” Ram replies.

From here we are transported into the glittery sometimes brutal world of Wrestling. I admit I’ve never been much of a wrestling fan and never could tell how much of it was real and how much was fake. In this portrayal the answer becomes clear when Ram endures a gory host of wounds in a hardcore wrestling match that are inflicted by a smorgasbord of shattered glass, barbed wire, and a staple gun while bleeding profusely for the audience’s lust and enjoyment. The parallels between the character Randy Robinson and the son of man (suffering at the hands of men) are muted but distinct.

The portrayal of battered fighter Randy ”The Ram” Robinson was not a far stretch for Mickey Rourke who himself was a boxer prior to becoming an actor and even returned to boxing at the height of his film career when he shocked everyone and disappeared, working the amateur and eventually professional boxing circuit for 5 years. During that time Mickey sustained a number of injuries including a broken nose, split tongue, and a compressed cheekbone. All of which may have led to his altered facial appearance.

Physically, Mickey seems to have transformed his body for this role as well. So much so that there has been speculation about whether he had any “help” enhancing his body for the film. When asked this question in an interview Mickey denied the use of steroids or other growth hormones responding, “I did some stuff. You wouldn’t classify it as steroids, but I did some heavy duty supplements.” For the physical transformation alone, I think Mickey should win the Oscar.

Marisa Tomei was also acknowledged by the Academy and is up for the Best Supporting Actress award for her portrayal of Cassidy, the stripper with the heart of a poet who just wants to move her son to Trenton and give him a better life. Cassidy isn’t quite a friend or a love interest. Randy is her regular “customer” with whom she has something in common. She is a woman who understands what it’s like to be aging in a profession where looks matter and your body is your business.

Clad with tattoos and nipple rings, male audience goers will enjoy watching Marisa Tomei give lap dances and gyrate up and down the stripper pole. In a courageous film choice, playing that of a single middle aged mother stripping to make ends meet, she not only makes the character work, she looks terrific and refreshing as a naturally beautiful actress with no evidence of cosmetic augmentations or enhancements. Something seriously lacking in today’s cinematic industry.

Trying to help Randy find himself again, Cassidy urges him to get in touch with his estranged daughter Stephanie, played by Evan Rachel Wood. I have been a big fan of Evan’s since the late 1990’s television series Once and Again with her sensitive portrayal of a young daughter dealing with her parents divorce. Her time on screen in the Wrestler is brief but highly affecting, she gives a heart wrenching and poignant performance.

In one emotion packed scene Randy (Mickey) is talking to Stephanie (Evan) at the beach where he used to take her as a little girl, and acknowledges that he can’t ask for forgiveness or change the past:

“I’m an old broken down piece of meat and I deserve to be all alone. I just don’t want you to hate me.”

Randy the “Ram” Robinson is a role that Mickey Rourke was born to play. Every inch of his ripped muscles, bashed up face, and survivor’s spirit provide the landscape for this story which at its heart is about how far down someone can sink from where they began. Marisa Tomei and Evan Rachel Wood are impressive in their own right, complimenting the rough exterior and violence of the film with scenes that are alternately tender, heartbreaking, and real.

In the end, the Wrestler isn’t a film about wrestling (though fans will enjoy the decadence and flare) and despite the attachments to other characters, I don’t think it’s a film about relationships with others; it’s about the relationship we have with ourselves. It’s about self worth: being true to yourself and holding onto that until the bitter end.

It’s about the struggle to resist the dark forces and inner demons that threaten to lead us down the wrong road. A universal struggle we can all relate to, on some level. It’s about second chances and the choices that we make because it’s who we are – and how sometimes, no amount of love or redemption can change that.

iChef Swett

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

No responses yet

Feb 15 2009

The Pink Panther

Published by admin under All, Cinema, Entertainment, Movies, iChef Cinema

I’m old school and what first comes to mind when I think about the Pink Panther is the cartoon I watched as a kid and then the more titillating Blake Edwards, Peter Sellers, Pink Panther incarnation.

So when I see Steve Martin, whom I like quite a bit, very diverse in the many different roles he’s played, I don’t see it working. I watch the trailer and say, WHY? Why go there? It’s been done and the trailers make me cringe! Steve Martin is making my toes curl, with the same french accent he made so funny, years ago!

Steve Martin made me howl when he used that fake french accent and said, omelet du fromage, followed by the french have a different word for everything! on his album Wild and Crazy Guy album.

So did somebody say, “hey don’t you think Steve Martin’s french accent is so funny lets remake the classic Pink Panther.”

Anyway I never saw the first remake of the Pink Panther and probably wouldn’t go to see Pink Panther 2 except it’s a movie the kids wanted to see and it looked pretty kid friendly. It’s Steve Martin afterall. And, Andy Garcia, Jean Reno, John Cleese, Lily Tomlin, Alfred Molina. Not to mention lookers like Emily Mortimer and  Aishwarya Rai are pleasing to the eye.

This is what I can say: It was enjoyable enough for the whole family and I don’t regret it at all. Insp. Jacques Clouseau’s rendition (not to be confused with sending enemies of the state to countries to be questioned / detained…) by Steve Martin was okay. The Clouseau character was written well and I liked some of his traits—he actually had some talent, not just tripping over the clue. The supporting cast was also good—we like all those actors and they did an okay job. The story was also okay. The wine bottle scene was very well done and entertainingly funny.

I still liked the old school versions of Peter Sellers Insp. Jacques Clouseau better and the earlier iterations of Blake Edwards Pink Panther better too—they went too far in the later ones, but for the whole family Pink Panther 2 was—okay.

—iChef Cinema

PS. I also like Steve Martin being Steve Martin funny versus Steve Martin being Peter Sellers funny.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

One response so far

Feb 13 2009

Taken

Liam Neeson plays bad-ass well!  Very well!

If Harrison Ford played Liam Neeson bad-ass in the last Indiana Jones movie it might have had a chance… Bottom line: bad-ass only works if, you are in fact, bad-ass!

Examples of Bad-ass:

You’re a Terminator like Arnold Schwarzenegger in The Terminator and Arnold is scary, unrepentant, unstoppable, and kills lots of people.

You’re Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction and you shoot Brett because you told him if he said “WHAT, one more time,” you would.

Examples of NOT Bad-ass:

You’re a Terminator like Arnold Schwarzenegger in Terminator 2: Judgment Day and a little boy orders you not to kill anybody and you don’t—that’s not bad-ass, just bad.

You’re Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction and you let Jimmie Dimmick talk to you like you’re his bitch—I get it, it was Quentin Tarantino’s movie afterall…

Taken was as good as the preview, no—it was better, because it lived up to it.

The storyline was good because it bordered on being possible. Maybe it’s because as an audience we want to believe it was possible. The kind of evil that’s being battled was real enough—human trafficking and the sex trade of underage girls. Abductions in a foreign country are real enough. Government corruption and complicity are real enough. And finally ex-spy preventer Liam Neeson who plays Brian Mills, an obsessed ex-spy father whose daughter is abducted, is a as good as it gets as far as a combination of James Bond, Jason Bourne, John McClane, with two extra helpings of bad-ass!

I thought what made this movie different was that there was no delay, no hesitation of what needed to be done. There was no saying just shoot’em, don’t wait, shoot’em now—the bad guys were already dead!

Brian Mills was emotional yet almost dead-on-perfect in his execution. Brian brings the wrath we all wish we could be capable of bringing to the people trying to imprison their child as a sex slave.

Liam Neeson is believable in this role and I would guess there will be future iterations of his character—he was just too good for there not to be…

Go see Taken and you will be taken to and rescued from a place you know exists in the deepest bowels of hell on earth by a bad-ass dad!

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

No responses yet

Jan 22 2009

Slumdog and Aqui

Slumdog Millionaire gives Clint and Grand Torino a run for your money!
AND Aqui Cal Mex in Campbell second time around…
.
First the Movie: Slumdog, which I originally wasn’t that interested quickly captured my attention with two battery cables being attached to the main characters toes…

The story itself was very creatively told with flashbacks and the game show Who Wants to be a Millionaire in real time at the interrogation in the police station. The story is told in three generations of the same characters—all the actors at the different ages were great, believable, convincing and looked plausible that they were in fact the same person at different ages of their life.

Watching the life in the slum areas of India was telling and interesting to me. The level of poverty in some areas of the world is downright shocking. And although we see a rendition on the big screen there really is no way of really understanding unless you’ve lived through it and I am in no way saying I really understand the squalor or struggle. I’m just saying from what I could see it was shocking.

Slumdog, was very much a love story about a boy Jamal, who keeps losing the girl Latika, throughout his life to which he is constantly searching through the struggle that is his life. Jamal and his older brother Salim who lose their mother to Muslim killing rebels, have to survive in an utter squalid world alone on the streets, dumps, and slums. Battling poverty, starvation, ruthless adults taking advantage, the mob world doing what they must to survive—and they all do pretty well under the circumstances. A feel good movie ending that is hopefull—Definitely one of the top movies of the year, but I’m still liking Grand Torino a little bit more for different reasons…

*************

Segundo the Dinner: Aqui Cal Mex in Campbell was something to look forward to because the first time was caught us off guard good! Aqui is a casual, upscale, full service bar, seat yourself, cafeteria tray, pick up your own food when the buzzer starts beeping, but the food quality is really good.

Started off a little rough during ordering because I think they chose to be a little cut-your-nose-off cheap, versus penny-wise that would have made all the difference in the world to me. In fact the more I think about it, it was bullshit!

We ordered two drinks—Margarita on the rocks, and Sangria with NO ICE. Sangria is already chilled why do I need ice? When asked we chose the large 16 oz size. The cashier was new with a manager on his shoulder assisting. The Sangria and Margarita were both in one of those old style juice cooler with a tap on the bar. The manager informed me he would only be pouring the amount of Sangria in the glass that he would if there was ice in it. Umm-kay, if that’s what you think is good business… So he poured it 2 inches from the top. It cost $5.50 for the glass not that cheap considering the cost of the meal itself. If I would have ordered a glass of wine he wouldn’t have put ice in it, or poured less because there was no ice—same thing with soda. Okay, I understand you’re not talking about the same profit point, but… I’m telling you it comes across as CHEAP with a bad after taste. I will order beer in a bottle from now on!

I ordered the same thing as the first time because it was so good—crab cake on a bed of spinach salad and diced mangoes and zesty dressing, sprinkles with crunchy tortilla strips. It’s a very tasty number and for the price of $7.99 I don’t think you can beat it.

My Sous Chef had the Chicken Limon special $8.99 with some noodle cake and string beans. A whole breast of chicken that was tender and lemony, the noodle cake was interesting, but, and the beans needed some seasoning.

The Sangria or the Margarita $5.95 wasn’t as good as I remembered them to be the first time, but I didn’t ask to have the Sangria without the ice the first time and they didn’t tell me they were going to short sheet the bed either—not sure if that played into enjoying it less or not…

We’ll be back—probably.

Aqui Cal-Mex on Urbanspoon

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

No responses yet

Jan 11 2009

Grand Torino

Published by iChef Cinema under All, Cinema, Entertainment, Movies, P S A

OMFG…

We had a Ford Grand Torino growing up. It was a station wagon. Growing up Hutch’s Starsky had a Grand Torino, the cool kind, tomato red with a white stripe—we all wish we had. My friend Peach in HS had a blue Grand Torino, it was blue basic, killer engine and stereo system.

The name alone requires anyone from that generation to see this movie. This movie affected me deeply and I just saw it so I’m not sure I should be talking about it yet. I had to wait until all of the credits were over before I even attempted to get out of my seat. When I did stand up I had to rush out to avoid anyone see me losing it.

I don’t know that everyone will react the way I did, I’m still not sure why I reacted the way I did.

If the Sitcom All in the Family was a drama, Clint Eastwood would have been the definitive Archie Bunker character (played by Carroll O’Connor.) Archie was a lovable character regardless of his misguided racially inflammatory ways—he was a victim (he wouldn’t like to be called a victim…) product of his environment or nurture. He was a flawed character that when shown the light had character. That was Norman Lear’s point—transform society by using reverse psychological method.

(More irascible perspective of All in the Family can be read in The End of the World, TG, and Sacrifice.)

This movie is a drama and I can’t ever remember laughing so much during such a deep and culturally complex movie. It was laughing at the slice of life presented versus comedy, be it funny dialog, slapstick, or circumstance.

This is one of Clint Eastwood’s best films… Acting—Clint’s acting was so good I’m still unsure of my footing. Dialog—genius! Storyline—fantastic! Irascibility factor—through the roof!

I can’t explain it just yet and it will have to be revisited, but this could be one of the greatest movies of all time!

Skip work, skip school, skip eating for the day, skip any and all excuses, and make seeing this movie a top priority in your life!

—iChef Cinema

Other voices:

Video: The obligatory “Gran Torino” trailer by Allahpundit

Someone who DIDN’T LIKE the movie (a lot of anger going on here) Wowie! Another perspective I guess: Grand Torino: Clint Eastwood And The White Mans Burde

Gran Torino (review) Hey You Kids Get Off My Law

Mickey Pagels’ Top 10 For 2008

Movie Review: Gran Torino by Ed Morrissey

Gran Torino had at one time been rumored to be the latest sequel to the Dirty Harry series.  While that’s not the case, one might conjecture that Harry Callahan and Walt Kowalski might have been fast friends.  Kowalski, a Korean War veteran, has the same attitudes towards minorities and the same distance from the people around him.  Kowalski has to face off against criminals, like Harry Callahan, but Gran Torino shows that Clint Eastwood has done a lot of thinking about the vengeance genre — and has produced a deconstruction as worthy as Unforgiven was for Westerns.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

2 responses so far

Jan 07 2009

Valkyrie

I never heard the tale of Valkyrie before (why they spell it with a “v” versus the German way, with a “w” I don’t know) And it’s such an interesting story, a plot to overthrow Hitler, that came very close to actually working! (I’m not giving anything away Hitler wasn’t assassinated) Also, I think a valuable story for German’s, Germany, and history in general. There’s a question right there, Why hasn’t this story been told to the masses before?

Okay, controversy. Tom Cruise has become synonymous with controversy. Why? Not sure except for his wacky public behavior. But should we even measure the jesters the same as normal folks?

The making of the movie was controversial, not sure why. Somebody said some people died while making the movie—tragic yes, controversial, I don’t know. Really don’t care about the controversy or the controversial subject matter of the film. Solid story, well acted and directed. Maybe, you still can’t talk about the war in Germany, such an ugly stain on the country because of Hitler. Yet, it seemed to me that Tom Cruise was trying to take away some of that stain with the whole point of the movie—Not all Germans were happy with or supported Hitler and some even risked their lives as well as the lives of their families. So what’s controversial about that? It’s noble isn’t it?

Now as for the movie—DYNAMITE cast! Love Bill Nighy, Kenneth Branagh, Kevin McNally, Terence Stamp (General Zod), and yeah, I love Tom Cruise too!

Lets get to the heart of why I liked it so much—We all know what happens! It’s a movie filled with suspense, yet we all know the outcome before it even starts! We know that Hitler is not assassinated, yet we watch with hope that somehow the plan actually works—and it all works anyway!

This movie is in the tradition of WW2 movies that I grew up with: The Great Escape (1963) with Steve McQueen Capt. Hilts “The Cooler King”, The Eagle Has Landed (1976) with Donald Sutherland…. Liam Devlin, and who could forget The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) with William Holden and Alec Guinness.

All classics, all suspenseful, all not going exactly to plan, yet classics that I’ll never forget! Suspense, intrigue, spies, deception, willingness to do what’s necessary for the greater good…

Now there were times during the movie I had time to think and was wondering if there was some Hollywood message intertwined—Hollywood just can’t pass up an opportunity to try to indoctrinate the masses with their conspiracy theories, or that America is somehow the enemy, or that America is the problem with the world, etc.

I tried to resist the thoughts, but they did pop in and out of my head. For example: When I was growing up and saw a Few Good Men, with Tom Cruise and Jack Nicholson, I I thought Tom Cruise was the good guy and Jack Nicholson was the bad guy…
(Jack Nicholson) Col. Nathan R. Jessep was right—I do want him on that wall, we do need him on that wall!

(Tom Cruise) Lt. Daniel Kaffeedid make the country weaker that day! I didn’t get that when I was a kid. I get it now…

—iChef Cinema

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

No responses yet

Next »